Legal Opinion

Arik Williams v. California Highway Patrol, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 20, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00787Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARIK WILLIAMS, No. 2:25-cv-787 DAD-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action against the California Highway Patrol (“CHP”) 19 and CHP Officer Brett Wade. He challenges a February 21, 2025 vehicle stop by Officer Wade, 20 which led Officer Wade to impound his vehicle. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to 21 dismiss this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API