State Ex Rel. Draham v. Yelle
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSteinert, J.
(dissenting)—-Stripped of its statutory quotation and reference, and aside from the deductive processes employed in reaching its conclusion, the holding of the majority opinion is, tersely stated, simply this: Although the legislature has specifically appropriated the sum of ten million dollars, or so much thereof as may be necessary, from a particular fund, to be devoted to construction work for unemployment relief, nevertheless the various county welfare boards, by their respective vouchers drawn on the state auditor, may divert substantial portions of the money so appropriated and compel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stovall v. Toppenish School District No. 49Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Howlett v. CheethamWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Fair v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- State ex rel. Griffin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Scouten v. City of WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.