Britt v. BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Appellee’s briei states the question for decision as: “Does the Odum deed, which conveys the land in question, contain a condition subsequent that could defeat the title?”
The Odums are not parties to this action. They cannot be bound without an opportunity to be heard. No matter how laudable the purpose of the parties to this action, no judicial declaration should be made which could have no binding effect, but which might seriously cloud and interfere with such rights as the Odums may have. Adhering to our practice, Morganton v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co., 247 N.C. 666, 101 S.E. 2d 679;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Town of Morganton v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Edmondson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Peel v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Thomas v. . ReavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Story v. WalcottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oxendine v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- SPOONER'S CREEK LAND CORPORATION v. StyronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Bank of Wadesboro v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. GambleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969