Bank of Wadesboro v. Jordan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
Many thousands of dollars are involved in this proceeding. While this fact does not change applicable principles of law, nevertheless it does increase the likelihood that the surviving blood kin of William Daniel Teal, Jr., may eventually present themselves and claim as successors to his interest. This proceeding should not be concluded until they are legally before the court. Presented, therefore, is the question whether publication of the notice to Cora Barnes and husband, Lexie Barnes, and all unknown heirs and next of kin of William Daniel Teal, Jr., (formerly Joseph Laster Barnes) was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Com'rs of Roxboro v. BumpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Town of Morganton v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Peel v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Bennett v. CainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Ferguson v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Bridge Division United States Steel Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- AMERICAN BRIDGE DIVISION US STEEL CORP. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. GambleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Sutton v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962