Legal Opinion

Doherty v. Oregon Water Resources Director

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1989No. CA A40087; SC S35460PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

This is a judicial review of the state Water Resources Director’s amended order, entered in 1986, declaring 274 square miles in Umatilla and Morrow counties a critical ground water area. Several agricultural irrigators challenge the order which can lead to controls on volume of water pumped from area wells. The Court of Appeals upheld the declaration of the Butter Creek Critical Ground Water Area with subareas, as well as the order that no new applications be accepted to appropriate ground water or to expand or change existing uses. Doherty v. Oregon Water Resources Director, 92 Or App 22,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Re Determination of Water Rights of Hood River.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Pense v. McCallOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Diack v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Doherty v. Oregon Water Resources DirectorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colclasure v. Washington County School District No. 48-JOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. DiCarlo v. Surety Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1989
  4. Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Columbia RiverOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Staten v. SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API