Legal Opinion

Biserni v. Culhane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., in which a jury verdict was returned in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 19, 1974, which denied their motion, inter alia, to set aside the verdict. Order affirmed, without costs. Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be said that the jury’s verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence (Olsen v Chase Manhattan Bank, 10 AD2d 539, affd 9 NY2d 829; Goldberg v Elkom Co., 47 AD2d 539; Roth v City of New York, 31 AD2d 817; Pertofsky v…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Olsen v. Chase Manhattan BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Olsen v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Pertofsky v. DrucksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. Goldberg v. Elkom Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Roth v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API