Olsen v. Chase Manhattan Bank
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Under the trial court’s instructions, which were not excepted to by plaintiff and thereby constituted the law of the case, it was error to set aside the jury’s verdict in favor of defendant bank. As to defendants architects and engineers, the evidence showed that their sole supervisory function was to insure performance of the construction work in accordance with the plans and specifications; to see that standards of safety were met in relation to the permanent construction, adjacent buildings, streets and subways, but not the safety of temporary platforms used in connection with the…
2Cited by49 opinions
- Miller v. DeWittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Lipka v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Associated Engineers, Inc. v. JobCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Krieger v. J. E. Greiner Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- McDowell v. Di PronioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.