Legal Opinion
Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 18, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0770PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge.
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 balances the twin goals of conserving our nation’s aquatic resources and allowing U.S. fisheries to thrive. To further those ends, the Act sets forth a detailed regulatory scheme that engages both the Secretary of Commerce — through her delegate, the National Marine Fisheries Service— and eight regional Fishery Management Councils in overseeing the harvest of our nation’s oceans. The Service and Councils manage fisheries largely through Fishery Management…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Conservation Law Foundation v. PritzkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. RossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Estes v. U.S. Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Conservation Law Foundation v. PritzkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.