Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Law Offices Howard Lee Schiff, P.C.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 4, 2019No. 3:16-cv-00791Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT LUIS GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:16-cv-791 (VAB) LAW OFFICES HOWARD LEE SCHIFF, P.C., Defendant. RULING AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS Luis Garcia (“Plaintiff”) has moved for an order awarding attorneys’ fees and costs under 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) against the Law Offices of Howard Lee Schiff (“Defendant” or “the Schiff firm”). Mot. for Attorney’s Fees, ECF No. 95 (Aug. 30, 2019). Mr. Garcia requests $67,707.50 in attorney’s fees. For the following reasons, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Millea v. Metro-North RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.