Legal Opinion

State v. Moody

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ObimiNal action tried, before Ferguson, J., and a jury, at Fall Term, 1916, of Jackson. Defendant was convicted and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Tbe defendant was indicted for tbe seduction of an innocent and virtuous woman under a promise of marriage. Revisal, see. 3354.

Tbe statute provides tbat tbe “unsupported testimony” of tbe woman shall not be sufficient to convict.

There are three essential elements of this crime: first, tbe seduction; second, tbe innocence and virtuousness of tbe woman; third, tbe promise of marriage inducing consent of tbe woman to tbe sexual act. S. v. Pace, 159 N. C., 462; S. v. Cline, 170 N. C., 751. Tbe prosecutrix testified to tbe defendant’s promise of marriage; tbat she was persuaded by it to have…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Ande v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  3. Whatley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. State v. . HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. State v. CurranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. . McDadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. State v. . MearesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. State v. MearesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API