Legal Opinion

Cervena v. Thurston

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1899No. 9,047PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Gage county. Tried below before Letton, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

William Thurston brought ejectment to recover a small strip of land,, the petition containing the usual averments in an action of that kind. The defendants answered by a general denial, and also pleaded ten years’ adverse possession. This last defense was put in issue by the reply. Verdict was for plaintiff, and defendants have prosecuted error from the judgment entered thereon.

It is first insisted that the verdict was insufficient. *344No objection as to the form of the verdict having been made at the time it was returned into court, the point is not available here. See Parrish v. McNeal, 36…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wiruth v. LashmettNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kuh v. FlynnNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Larsen v. SanzieriNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API