Legal Opinion

Wiruth v. Lashmett

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1909No. 15,291PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Rehearing of case reported in 82 Neb. 375.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, C. J.

This canse is now before the court on rehearing. The former opinion is reported in 82 Neb. 375. The essential facts are stated in that opinion and need not be here repeated.

It is contended by defendants that the two instructions referred to and set out at length in the opinion correctly stated the law, but, even if erroneous, the error was without prejudice, as they related only to the right of plaintiff to recover, and the verdict was in plaintiff’s favor upon the issues involved, and therefore he cannot complain. Hankins v. Majors, 56 Neb. 299, is cited in support thereof and sustains the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fromme v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  2. Poulson v. CollierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Brumback v. German National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cates v. NickellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  5. Roggenkamp v. HargreavesNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Calnon v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Printing Industry v. BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Kenesaw Mill & Elevator Co. v. AufdenkampNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Bank of Axtell v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Kimball v. LanningNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API