Employers Mutual Insurance v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
THIS is an action against Pitkin county, Colorado, to recover on securities issued by the county and consisting of three of its bonds with one interest coupon attached to each. The district court having entered a judgment in favor of the county, the bondholder brings the case here for review and asks for a reversal.
The bonds are refunding bonds. These and the coupons are in the usual form, all maturing on October 1, 1931, and containing the county's absolute promise to pay. Each instrument constitutes a complete contract in itself, and contains a provision that it is payable at the office of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bank of Montreal v. IngersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Binghampton Pharmacy v. First National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Lazier v. HoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. School District No. 17Montana Supreme Court · 1935
- Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. EpstinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- City of Sterling v. Commercial Savings BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- City Real Estate, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Hamm v. Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Hamm v. Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.