Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 5, 1965No. 20789Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

It is rather unusual when two writs of error are issued, each of which is directed to a judgment entered in a single trial in the district court. The instant action presents a second phase of the multiple controversies involved in the record before this court in cause No. 20777 (Twin Lakes v. Bond, et al., decided this date). The issues raised in the instant case are wholly unrelated to the questions determined in No. 20777, supra, and our decision in that case is in no way applicable to this cause.

In 1959 Eugene Bond brought an action under the partition statute against The Twin Lakes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Insurance v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  2. Superior Distributing Corporation v. ZarelliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API