Legal Opinion

Haugh v. Haywood

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1919No. 9,699PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Marion Superior Court (98,287); Vincent G. Clifford, Judge. Action . by Otto Haywood against Joseph Guy Haugh. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.

This action was brought by appellee against appellant to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution, in which appellee was charged with being guilty of the crime of petit larceny. The .complaint was in one paragraph. Trial was had, and a jury returned their verdict in favor of appellee and assessed his damages at $200. Motion for new trial was made and overruled, and cause appealed to this court

Appellant has filed his motion herein to strike from the files of this case the brief of appellee, because, it is alleged, they do not comply -with the rules of this court. This motion is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huber Manufacturing Co. v. BlessingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Farmers Trust & Savings Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. NorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gray v. JamesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Martin v. GoldsberryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Krabbe v. City of LafayetteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API