Legal Opinion
Hensgen v. Silberman
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1948No. Civ. 16321PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
The instant action was instituted by Esther Hensgen, as special administratrix of the estate of Nicholas Carl Hensgen, deceased; Thelma Hensgen Neal, widow of decedent, and the two minor daughters of decedent and said widow, against Rose Silberman, the alleged second wife of decedent, to recover the proceeds of a life insurance policy, certain cash, bonds and other personal property acquired during the marriage of decedent and said Rose Silberman.
This appeal has been perfected by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendant Rose Silberman, based upon findings of fact of the trial court to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Starbuck v. . StarbuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Querze v. QuerzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Spence v. State Nat. Bank of El PasoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Bartholomew v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.