Legal Opinion

Patchell v. Automobile Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 24, 2001No. AC 19761PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The plaintiff,1 Mary Jane Patchell, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the denial of her motions to set aside the verdict.2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) denied her motions to set aside the verdict and (2) instructed the jury on damages. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts as to the accident that is the basis of this action. On February 4, 1989, in North Haven, the plaintiff was driving an automobile when she was struck in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Amsden v. FischerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Preston v. WellspeakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamernick v. BachConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Patterson v. Meyer, No. Cv98 035 70 52 (Jul. 17, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API