Legal Opinion

Constantino v. Dock's Clam Bar & Pasta House

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Tottenville Commons and John Noce appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Gigante, J.), dated December 11, 2007, as denied that branch of their motion which was to compel the plaintiff Christopher Constantino to provide authorization for the release of his high school records.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court has broad discretion in the supervision of discovery, and its determinations should not be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Storrar v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re U. S. Pioneer Electronics Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Auerbach v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Gillen v. Utica First InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Youngquist v. YoungquistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lopes v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Conte v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Karanikolas v. Elias Taverna, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Shollenberger v. MalaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Hatter v. MyersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API