Legal Opinion
Conte v. County of Nassau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 9, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*559The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant County of Nassau which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. The County demonstrated, prima facie, that the subject sidewalk and catch basin were installed and maintained by the defendant City of Glen Cove and not the County, and, in opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). As such, the Supreme Court properly denied, as academic, the plaintiffs motion for a further deposition…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kooper v. KooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ayubo v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Auerbach v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- NBT Bancorp, Inc. v. Fleet/Norstar Financial Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clarke v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Anderson v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Karanikolas v. Elias Taverna, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Clarke v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014