Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Atlantic & P. Tel. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1901No. 340PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On Motion by Defendant to Enter Judgment with the Reduction Specified in the Reserved Point.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the city of Philadelphia to recover license fees charged against the defendant in respect of its poles and wires by virtue of certain ordinances. When the suit was brought, the fees for the year 1885 were more than sis years overdue, and the question for consideration under the reserved point is whether recovery of fees for that year is barred by the Pennsylvania statute of limitations.

The suit is in assumpsit, but, as the practice act of 1887 has applied this name indifferently to the three forms of action that were known as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roller v. MeredithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Erny's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Frailey Township School District v. Schuylkill Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Greene Tree Home Owners Ass'n v. Greene Tree AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Little v. KohnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Town of Gallup v. Gallup Cold Storage Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API