Legal Opinion

Little v. Kohn

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1911No. 46PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by Jane Little, to the use, etc., against Arnold Kohn.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The defendant was a stock holder in a Kansas corporation, the Lombard Investment Company, and is now sued upon the double liability created by the Constitution and laws of that state. One of his defenses is the Pennsylvania statute of limitation, passed in 1713 (1 Smith’s Laws, p. 76), to which the plaintiff replies that the statute does not cover the case, and that nothing can bar the suit except the presumption of payment, which has not yet arisen. A very complete history of the company’s affairs is given by Judge Van Devanter in the course of an interesting…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co. v. LombardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. Carrol v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Austin, Commissioner v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. International Mortgage Trust Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Ward v. RiceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API