Legal Opinion
In Re Kingsley
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 16, 1988No. 19-20155PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON OBJECTION TO CHAPTER 13 PLAN
ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
The State of Connecticut objects to confirmation of the debtors’ Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan on the ground that it fails to provide for the post confirmation payment of interest on post petition taxes. The question here is whether Code § 1322(a)(2) requires such interest payments. For the reasons that follow, I conclude that it does not.
I
On March 1, 1984, the debtors filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. On November 13,1987, the State of Connecticut filed an objection to confirmation…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re American Mariner Industries, Inc., Debtor. Crocker National Bank v. American Mariner Industries, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Everett Assocs. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- In Re SiegfriedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1990
- In Re HagemanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1989
- In Re DorfUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.