Legal Opinion

People v. Hernandez

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1985No. Docket 72645, 72646PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This defendant persuaded the trial court to exclude evidence that he had committed a prior bad act. The issue now before us is whether the defendant’s own direct examination testimony introduced the subject to the jury, thus opening the door for the prosecution to cross-examine the defendant on the prior bad act and introduce rebuttal testimony that the prior bad act did occur. We agree with the defendant that his testimony on direct examination did not introduce the prior bad act and that evidence of the prior bad act should not have been admitted at trial. We therefore reverse the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. GolochowiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. McGillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. MajorMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. HillhouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martez Bickham v. Thomas WinnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. People v. EngelmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. KattMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. People v. LeoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. People v. SutherlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API