Legal Opinion

Weir v. Rahon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1980No. 309PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants contend that the lower court erred in its determination of the amount of damages to be awarded to appellees for breach of an oral contract to convey land. For the reasons which follow, we modify the order of the court below.

In April of 1977, plaintiffs-appellees entered into an oral contract to purchase a parcel of land in a development known as Western Ranehette from defendant-appellant Elsie Rahon. At that time, plaintiffs believed that the property was owned by Elsie Rahon and her sister. In fact, however, the property was owned by Elsie Rahon and her husband,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Corace v. BALINT (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Polka v. MaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Hertzog v. Hertzog's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  4. Rineer v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Seidlek v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fannin v. CrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Mirizio v. JosephSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Hostetter v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. American Leasing v. Morrison Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Empire Properties, Inc. v. Equireal, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API