Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Indemnity Co. v. Martin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1999No. Nos. 98-1384 and 98-1492PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The issue certified for our review is “whether an insurer has a duty to indemnify and/or defend a homeowner/policyholder against a wrongful death claim by a non-household member wrongful death beneficiary who is not an ‘insured’ under the policy when the death involved is that of an ‘insured’ under the policy.” For the reasons that follow, we answer the certified issue in the negative and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

It is axiomatic that an insurer may maintain a declaratory judgment action to determine its rights and obligations under a contract of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hybud Equipment Corp. v. Sphere Drake InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Thompson v. WingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Preferred Risk Insurance v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Martin v. Midwestern Group InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Coregis Insurance Company v. American Health FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. Davidson v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bondex International, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. Granger v. Auto-Owners Ins. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Scott v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API