Riter-Conley Manufacturing Co. v. Mzik
Cuyahoga Circuit Court
Heard on Error.
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
The defendant in error commenced an action in the court of common pleas against the plaintiff i-u error to recover compensation for injuries which he alleges were caused by the negligence of the plaintiff in *165error while in its employment. At the commencement of the action he procured an attachment to issue and garnishee process to be served upon the American Steel & Wire Company.
The plaintiff in error is a Pennsylvania corporation having its domicile in that state.
The garnishee, The American Wire & Steel Company, is a New Jersey corporation and domiciled in that state, but, by compliance with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Morawetz v. Sun Insurance OfficeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Lancashire Insurance v. CorbettsIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. ChumleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Holt v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.