Legal Opinion

Stolz v. Travelers Commercial Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 13, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01923Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD ROYCE STOLZ, II, No. 2:18-cv-1923-KJM-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION TO ENFORCE 13 v. (ECF No. 105) 14 TRAVELERS COMMERCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 This case arises out of a claim for insurance coverage under a homeowner’s policy issued 18 by Travelers. The property is located in El Dorado Hills, California, and Plaintiff Stolz holds 19 some property interest in it. The case has been significantly side–tracked by multiple discovery 20 disputes, which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Lee v. Max Intern., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. International Union Of Petroleum And Industrial Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Asea, Inc. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation, and Harbor Belt Line, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. TurnageDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API