Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Recreational Equipment, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 7, 2011No. 65463-2-IPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, C.J.

¶1 — The Washington product liability act (WPLA), chapter 7.72 RCW, sets forth a statutory form of vicarious liability whereby a product seller assumes the liability of a manufacturer where a product is marketed under the seller’s brand name. Because permitting the product seller to attribute fault to the actual manufacturer would abrogate this provision of the WPLA, principles of comparative fault do not apply, notwithstanding the possibility that statutory contribution may thereby be precluded. Such a result is not in contravention of our state’s statutory comparative fault system, as…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ainsworth v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. State v. RodriquezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Afoa v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. KirwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. SAUTER EX REL. SAUTER v. Houston Cas. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API