Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Vicki Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 13, 1974No. CA 5516; C.A.D. 1125Published

1DissentMilleR, Judge

I am not in agreement with the Customs Court in its determination that appellee carried its burden of proof that merchandise such as or similar to that imported was in fact “freely” sold or offered for sale to all purchasers on an ex-factory basis. The evidence does indeed show that the merchandise in question was sold on an ex-factory basis to appellee. However, the evidence also shows that appellee bargained •for its prices, and this is inconsistent with the statutory requirement (19 USC 1401a(b) j1 that the merchandise be “freely” sold or offered for sale for purposes of export value.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Millmaster International Inc., Millmaster International Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. The United States v. Pan American Import Corp., M. H. Garvey Co., the United States v. Hub Floral Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Ontario Stone Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API