Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Hoge

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1930No. Docket No. 7210PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JORGENSEN, J., pro tem.

This is an action by plaintiff as assignee of Dr. Evans, a duly licensed doctor of dental surgery for the reasonable value of professional dental services rendered at the request of defendants in and about the mouth of Evelyn A. Hoge, one of the defendants. On defendants’ demand the case was tried by a jury and a verdict rendered for the full amount prayed for in the complaint, to wit, $617, and defendants appeal from the judgment.

Defendants contended there was an express agreement to do the work for $503, with the possible increase or decrease of said amount by $10,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Sill v. ReeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. People v. EckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Tracy v. WatersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API