Dillard v. Colbert County Commission
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The question before the court in these two consolidated voting-rights cases is whether plaintiff Loyd D. Fulmer is a “prevailing party” entitled to attorney’s fees from defendant Colbert County Commission because, according to Fulmer, although a change in state law rendered his complaints in these two cases moot, the new state law was a direct consequence of the filing of his complaints. For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that he is not.
I. BACKGROUND
The history of one of these two cases, Dillard v. Colbert County Commission,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Holder v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Nipper v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- S-1 and S-2 v. State Board of Education of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- American Disability Assoc. v. Ariel ChmielarzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Laube v. AllenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007