Legal Opinion

Jester v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1982No. 62782PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

This case involves automobile insurance in which summary judgment has been granted to the alleged insurer.

For the purposes of consideration of the grant of summary judgment the following facts are admitted as true. The Brundick Company, Inc. is a Florida corporation qualified to do business in Georgia, being a managing general agency in the fire and casualty insurance field which operates as an intermediary between insurance companies wishing to do business in a state and agents wishing to represent a company. In April 1979 it acquired the general agency business of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Southeastern Fidelity InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Burch v. Americus Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Planters' Rice-Mill Co. v. Merchants' National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Commercial Credit Corp. v. NolesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Equitable Credit Corp. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. TGM Ashley Lakes, Inc. v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. StegallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Fortune v. Principal Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. International Indemnity Co. v. OdomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Holcomb v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API