Commercial Credit Corp. v. Noles
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.
The question raised by the exception is whether the evidence demanded a verdict for the plaintiff. If it did, it was error to grant the defendant’s motion for a new trial. But if there were issues of fact raised by the evidence, then the trial judge in his discretion properly granted a new trial to correct his error in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.
The plaintiff in error contends that the possession of the written contract by one of its agents does not impliedly authorize such agent to receive payment of money on the contract before the time such payment falls due, according to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fitzgerald Cotton Oil Co. v. Farmers Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Germain Co. v. Bank of Camden CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Davis v. Citizens-Floyd Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Roberts v. Bank of EufaulaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Armour Fertilizer Works v. AbelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Addley v. BeizerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Stewart v. MidaniDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
- Turnipseed v. JajeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Interstate Financial Corp. v. AppelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- International Indemnity Co. v. OdomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.