Legal Opinion

State v. Severson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 25, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Winnebago District Court, — Hon. G. W. Ruddick, Judge. Proceedings under tbe bastardy act to compel the defendant to maintain Ms alleged illegitimate child. There was a verdict of guilty, and from a judgment of maintenance the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

*654, „ fnrVeffree0'1’ of evidence, _. evidenee diet" newvei’ trial: appeal, *653I. We are asked to set aside the verdict in this case because it is not sustained by the *654evidence. It is not claimed that the evi&ence not conflicting. There is a decided conflict of evidence, and the testimony cannot be read by a disinterested party without a feeling of uncertainty as to what is a proper result. This is a proceeding to establish a civil liability, and the issue is to be determined by a preponderance of the evidence. State v. McGlothlin, 56 Iowa, 544. The weight of the evidence and the credibility of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sloan v. Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Johnson v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. State v. McGlothlenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CrouchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. State v. TiemanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Pruitt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. State v. NewmanOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API