Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Fine
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 28, 1947PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The defendants Jacob Fine and Henry H. Fine were convicted of subornation of perjury and also of conspiracy to incite, instigate and persuade one Johnson to commit perjury. They appealed from the convictions for subornation of perjury, assigning as errors the denial of their motions for directed verdicts of not guilty and the admission of a motion for a new trial which had been filed in a previous prosecution of Jacob Fine in which he had been convicted of being an accessory before the fact to the burning of a building with intent to defraud the insurer, G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 266, § 10, as…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Commonwealth v. PolianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Commonwealth v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Commonwealth v. GiacomazzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoransMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MichelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Commonwealth v. HawleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Limone v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.