Unitrac v. Southern Funding Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The question which determines this appeal is whether or not Mecklenburg County Superior Court had in personam jurisdiction over defendant Southern Funding Corporation, a resident of Florida. It did not.
Plaintiff Unitrac, Inc., claims that defendant had two contacts with North Carolina, which provided the basis for in personam jurisdiction. These were (1) the agreement between Unitrac and Southern Funding for the sale of yarn, as evidenced by a memorandum of sale and contract prepared by John L. Stickley in Charlotte, North Carolina, and (2) the fact that the yarn was shipped to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Byham v. National Cibo House CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Goldman v. Parkland of Dallas, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Harrelson Rubber Co. v. Dixie Tire & Fuels, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neugent v. Beroth Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Liberty Finance Co. v. North Augusta Computer Store, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Quidore v. All. Plastics, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020