Harrelson Rubber Co. v. Dixie Tire & Fuels, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRASWELL, Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Defendant’s argument is that no allegations in the complaint or in the affidavits submitted by both parties establish defendant had sufficient minimum contacts with the State of North Carolina to satisfy due process requirements of the United States Constitution.
The facts alleged in plaintiffs complaint showed the following: Plaintiff, a Delaware corporation with its principal offices in Asheboro, North Carolina, had developed a process for retreading tires which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United Buying Group, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Goldman v. Parkland of Dallas, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Telerent Leasing Corp. v. Equity Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- General Time Corp. v. Eye Encounter, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marion v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Barclays Leasing, Inc. v. National Business Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990
- Sola Basic Industries, Inc. v. Parke County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Hardin v. DLF Computer Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1985
- Monroe Hardware Co. v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.