Legal Opinion

Ann Arbor Railroad v. Railroad Commission

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided April 15, 1909Published

1Opinion of the CourtKineead, J.

The questions arise upon demurrer to the second cause of action.

Plaintiffs (thirty-five railroads), for their second'cause of action, aver that the defendant commission on March 20, 1908, made an order determining and fixing certain car service charges, regulations and practices, to be imposed, observed and followed in the future by all the plaintiff railroad companies.

The petition thereupon sets forth each and all of the rules so made and now complained of.

Without enumeration or going into details, it may be stated that the only question urged in argument relates to car service regulations,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API