Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Hoxsie

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 24, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.

The pleadings in this case, up to the present stage thereof, fully appear in the opinion of this court, by Stiness, C. J., reported in 24 R. I. p. 494. There we sustained the defendant’s third plea, which was based upon the special statute of limitations, on the plaintiff’s demurrer to said, plea, which plea alleged that the plaintiff did not bring her action against Samuel H. Cross, the original administrator, or against William Hoxsie the administrator de bonis non, within three years after the first publication of the notice of Cross’s qualification as administrator, and setting up the bar…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Emerson v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
  2. Wiggins v. Adm'r of LoveringSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ward v. MagahaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Umsted v. UmstedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. La Floridienne v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Cox v. AmendSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
  5. Carney v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API