Legal Opinion

The Favorita

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 22, 1929Published

1Opinion of the Court

BONDY, District Judge.

The libelant is entitled to prove its libel by admissions against interest made by respondent in its log books, or otherwise. Self-serving statements, made by respondent in its log books, are not competent evidence in favor of respondent. There is a conflict as to whether or not the production of log books can be compelled by interrogatories, and the weight thereof seems to establish that it cannot be done in that manner. See MacLeod & Co. v. U. S. (D. C.) 295 F. 432; Havermeyers & E. S. R. Co. v. Compania Transatlantica Espanola (D. C.) 43 F. 90; The Princess Sophia (D.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Havermeyers & Elder Sugar Refining Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1890
  2. The Princess SophiaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920
  3. MacLeod & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API