Legal Opinion

Havermeyers & Elder Sugar Refining Co. v. Compania Transatlantica Espanola

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 28, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Admiralty. Exceptions to interrogatories.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The libelant propounded interrogatories, in the libel under rule 23, calling for the production of any letters, cablegrams, or correspondence between the respondents and their, agents, or the master, relating to the damage to cargo, which forms the subject-matter of litigation. To these interrogatories the respondent objects as unauthorized. Rule 23 of the supreme court, in admiralty, provides that ,,the libelant may require the defendant- to answer all interrogatories “touching all and singular the allegations in the libel.” The interrogatories must be confined, therefore, to the allegations…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cushman v. RyanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1840

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. The Baker PalmerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1908
  3. The Princess SophiaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920
  4. Stoffregan v. The Mexican PrinceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1895
  5. Bock v. International Nav. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API