Legal Opinion

Hotchkiss v. Jones

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoache, J.

Jones, the plaintiff below, commenced an action of replevin before a justice of the peace for the unlawful taking of two hogs, of the value, as alleged in the affidavit, of 8 dollars.

The case was appealed to the Circuit Court. There the cause was submitted to the Court for trial. The finding and judgment of the Court are in the following words:

“ And the Court, after hearing the evidence and being fully advised in the premises, do find for the plaintiff, and assess his damages at twenty-one dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court now here, that the said plaintiff do have and recover…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haley v. Eureka County BankNevada Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Fesler v. BraytonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Smith v. State ex rel. HamillIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Smith v. Junction Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API