Legal Opinion

Michael Carley v. Department of the Army

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 28, 2005No. 04-3300Published

1Opinion of the Court

413 F.3d 1354

Michael CARLEY, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Respondent.

No. 04-3300.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: June 28, 2005.

Neil C. Bonney, Bonney & Allenberg, PC, of Virginia Beach, Virginia, for petitioner.

Joshua E. Gardner, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for respondent. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Daniel M. Kininmonth,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API