Legal Opinion

Microsoft Corp. v. Yokohama Telecom Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 5, 1998No. SA CV 97-0775-GLT SFPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

TAYLOR, District Judge.

The court holds the broad wording of California’s privileged publication statute, California Civil Code § 47(d), can accord an absolute privilege to a litigant’s paid newspaper announcement of a lawsuit’s allegations.

I. BACKGROUND

Microsoft Corporation sued defendants for copyright and trademark infringement. Defendant Yokohama counterclaimed, contending it was damaged by an allegedly defamatory paid announcement published by Microsoft in the Shih Chie Jin-pao or World Daily newspaper.

The announcement was directed at computer system…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Good Government Group of Seal Beach, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawran v. HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Healthsmart Pacific, Inc. v. KabateckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Argentieri v. ZuckerbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Adobe Systems Inc. v. ChristensonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2012
  5. Annemarie Wiley v. American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API