Legal Opinion

State v. LaBounty

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 1, 1997No. 96-180 & 96-191PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Before us on appeal are requests by intervenor

Caledonian-Record Publishing Co., Inc., a newspaper publisher, for access to presentence investigation reports (PSIs) prepared in connection with two separate criminal proceedings. In both eases, the trial courts denied access on the ground that confidentiality of PSIs is protected by statute. See 28 V.S.A. § 204(d). We are thus required to resolve the question we left open in State v. Densmore, 160 Vt. 131, 624 A.2d 1138 (1993): whether the qualified First Amendment right of access that attaches to documents submitted by parties in sentencing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. SoussoudisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Michael J. Corbitt, Pulitzer Community Newspapers, Inc., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Charmer Industries, Inc., and Peerless Importers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. Vermont Criminal Justice Training CouncilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. State v. KochSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. State v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API