Legal Opinion
Hudson Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2001No. 94 CIV 2741 (WCC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Hudson Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. (“Riverkeeper”) and Plaintiff-Intervenor Village of Hastings-on-Hudson (“Village”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring this environmental action against defendant Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”) under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6901, et seq., alleging that ARCO, corporate successor to Anaconda Wire & Cable Company (“Anaconda”), is liable for contamination of the Hudson River (the “Hudson”) allegedly caused by Anaconda while manufacturing electrical cable…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harris v. Provident Life And Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Interfaith Community Organization v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Solvent Chem. Co. ICC Industries, Inc. v. EI Dupont De Nemours & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. CapassoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control v. Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.