Legal Opinion

Lange v. Hoyt

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 29, 1932PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

The appellant assigns error in the refusal of the court to set aside the verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs; in refusing to charge the jury in some particulars as requested by the defendant, and also in the charge as delivered.

From the evidence, the jury might reasonably have found the following facts: May 2d, 1930, the plaintiff Minelda Lange, a minor eight years of age, was alighting from a school bus then stationary and facing in a northeasterly direction upon the right-hand side of the Georgetown-Bethel Turnpike, a highway in the town of Redding. The bus was standing approximately…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daley v. Norwich & Worcester RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  2. Roth v. ChatlosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  3. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. BluhmIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Wilmot v. McPaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  5. Sauter v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wheatley Ex Rel. Wheatley v. HeidemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Preston v. KeithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Christiansen v. HollingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Hallas v. Boehmke & Dobosz, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Schmeltz v. TracySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API