Legal Opinion

Sauter v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1876PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The circumstances proved were sufficient to authorize the jury to find that the injury was caused by the act of the defendant's employes. The evidence tends to show that as the plaintiff's intestate was passing out of the car to alight, a sudden jerk was given to it backward, and the plaintiff was thrown suddenly forward, his carpet-bag striking the railing, and he striking the carpet-bag. This was proved to be sufficient to cause the hernia of which he died. The circumstances pointed to this as the cause, and repelled the idea of any other. True, the evidence was that it might have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schell v. . PlumbNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Lyons v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Milks v. McIverNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. McCaffrey v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Pyke v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Fishburn v. Burlington & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Thompson v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API