Ex Parte Ritter
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
This appeal comes to this Court on certiorari for the second time. Previously we remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals for that court to consider whether or not the felony-murder doctrine was used to supply the requisite intent under our capital felony statute. Evans and Ritter v. State,361 So.2d 666 (Ala. 1978). On remand that court determined that the felony-murder doctrine was not so used and affirmed Ritter's conviction. Ritter v. State, [MS. Aug. 9,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ex Parte WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Ex Parte WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Ex Parte RainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.