Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Womack

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 8, 1983No. 82-546PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Certiorari was granted to consider three issues: (1) whether the trial court committed reversible error by allowing the petitioner's inculpatory statement to be introduced as evidence; (2) whether the trial court's jury instruction on aiding and abetting was erroneous; and (3) whether the death penalty should be imposed under the guidelines imposed by Beckv. State, 396 So.2d 645 (Ala. 1981).

I

The resolution of the first issue by the Court of Criminal Appeals, 435 So.2d 754, is correct. The facts of the accused's interrogation are correctly set forth in the opinion of that court. Two police…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Beck v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. United States v. William Timothy Chaney, A/K/A "James Kirk," A/K/A "James Baron,"Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Ex Parte RainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Elrod v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Bankhead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API